www.InformingChristians.com
-

 

 

Newsletter Page
2015
This page is added to as needed.

                     

     

NY Times Columnist ‘Fuming’ after Son Allegedly Stopped by Yale Cops at Gunpoint -- Here We Go Again

Okay, I get it. I really do get it. This is his son. I would be fuming too, if a child of mine was stopped at gunpoint by cops, mistaken for someone else. But can we please have some honesty here?

This man, Charles Blow said his third year Yale student son was accosted at gunpoint by a Yale policeman because his son fit the description of a suspect. He said his son was let go when the cops realized his son was a college student and not a criminal. Along with other comments, Charles Blow said on Twitter, "This is exactly why I have NO PATIENCE for ppl trying to convince me that the fear these young blk men feel isn't real."

First off this is not just a black thing. Whites have been mistakenly arrested at gunpoint too in this country. Secondly why doesn't this man get angry at the many blacks who do terrible things and make it hard on blacks? Does he really not realize that people do look very much alike to other races? Yes, there's going to be mistakes made like this. It doesn't make it racist.

And what about the fact that many people are scared of black men? How about how we feel, when we have to keep our car windows up and doors locked, when driving in the city, because of blacks killing people day and night in our cities? Let's talk fear!

Also for the record: I have no patience for people who wonder why cops fear black men. Let's be real and try some honesty!

Government Pensions Are NOT Taxed In New York State:

This is while others are.
New York & U.S. government employees do not pay NY State income tax on government pensions. The state did not want teachers paying state tax on theirs, so to be "fair" all government pensions are not taxed by NY. --Other New Yorkers have to pay the tax. Where is the equal protection?

Info source:
Click Here Talk about it on Facebook: Click Here


New York State Governor Wants More Money For Education:

The New York Constitution states that the state legislature shall "provide for the maintenance and support of a system of free common schools, wherein all the children of this state may be educated." --No where does it say there shall be a blank check to do whatever the heck they want to do with our tax dollars. But that's what has happened. They are taking our tax money and flushing it down the toilet that we call "public schooling".

The state constitution does not say the state shall pay for breakfast, lunches, after school programs, sports, music, theater, clubs, political agendas, and all other fluff. It does not say that it will pay teachers ridiculously high wages for nine months of work and high nontaxable pensions. It does not say that public schools should be built like resorts, with swimming pools and tennis courts, etc. And it absolutely does NOT say that children MUST attend or that the state can govern over other types of education, like home schooling.

New York State's education "system" has run-a-muck. It is totally out of control. Putting more money into a system that is already broken is only continuing an irresponsible behavior by this state.

And teachers should get paid as per their ability to actually educate the students and get fired at anytime if they prove to no longer be able to do such. Schools are supposed to be for the children, not the teachers.

Abortion on demand says some people are not as important as others and are dispensable. Ignorance causes people to not realize a baby in the womb is a real life, a human being. A fetus is a developing young in the uterus, the unborn offspring in the post-embryonic stage, in humans from nine weeks after fertilization until birth. Slave owners justified killing black slaves by saying black slaves were not human. And it was actually LEGAL to kill the slaves. Killing babies is not a solution
.

Sexuality & Marriage (Straight Talk) - With all the talk about sexuality and marriage, it only seemed right that I have an article that takes on this topic. This is especially with all the distortion that goes on in the world about these two things: Click Here

Liberals Largely At Fault For Some Black Kids Going Bad

If any group is largely to blame for a black kid growing up to do something so terrible, as to attack a cop, it is the liberals.

Liberals tell black kids that they are victims of whites and of cops. And they drill it into the kids' heads, to the point that many of these kids end up filled with so much hate for whites and for cops.

When you mix this with the free handouts and telling these kids that they are entitled to that which other people earn, it is the perfect recipe for creating very bad young adults.

Liberals brainwash these kids, all so that they will grow up and vote for liberals. So if you want to place blame on someone other than the black perpetrators in these situations, put the blame on liberals for manipulating their minds during their formative years on this earth. --And start with liberal public schools.

 

Republicans Set To Run Three Unqualified People

Why are Republicans getting set to have three men run who are NOT "natural" born citizens? A natural born citizen is someone who was born here and whose parents were born here. THIS is why Obama did not qualify, even IF he was born in America, because his father was not born here. And yet three Republicans are getting set to run (one again) who do not qualify.

Mitt Romney and Bobby Jindal were both born here, yes. But Romney's father was born in Mexico, to parents who grew up there. And Jindal's parents were both born in India. And Ted Cruz was born in Canada. Now I realize his mother was born in the U.S., and this makes Ted Cruz an American. But I do not believe such makes him a "Natural Born Citizen," because he was not actually born here and his father was not born here. But could I vote for Ted Cruz? See the right of this page for that commentary.

And for those of you who DON'T agree with me on what natural born citizen means and believe that a person simply has to have been born here, ask yourselves how you feel about some illegal immigrant coming here and popping out a Mexican flag waving anchor baby and that child growing up to be president.

Gov. Rick Perry and Sen. Rand Paul are the only two that look good for the Republican nomination to me. Don't even get me started on Jeb Bush!


Lesbian Rachel Maddow Claims American Family Association
Fired Evangelist Bryan Fischer

Click Here to view the YouTube.

 

Here's how I see the following Brian Fischer issues:

1) He was not fired from AFA. He simply no longer holds the title of Director of Issues Analysis. But he does still host the radio show, Focal Point on American Family Radio. Hence, he was not fired. But he was pretty-much thrown under the bus though, something not uncommon to happen to people in the right-wing movement.

2) His comments about Hitler and homosexuals were not saying that the Holocaust did not happen. Nor were the comments saying that the Nazis did not exist. His comments were saying that he believes Hitler found homosexual men to do most of the killing of the Jews, that he believes Hitler found homosexual men to have no problem committing such terrible acts on humans. -- I have no comment on this, because though I realize some homosexuals are very cruel and that some of them are the worst bullies I've ever encountered, I have no idea Hitler used them in such a way.

3) When he speaks of the first amendment to the U.S. Constitution being for Christianity, he is simply meaning that was what our founding fathers were referring to with the first amendment. And that is what they were referring to, Christianity. However the U.S. Government and the Courts have clearly extended such to other faith beliefs. And I assume he realizes this and is not out to change our current situation of religious freedom for all religions.

4) Another thing I found online claims that he does not believe AIDS is contracted through sex, but rather only through drug use. I disagree with him on this.

5) And finally something else I found is that while he considers Mormonism to not be true Christianity, he has no problem with the biggest cult, Catholicism (he shares the latter, at least, in common with the president of AFA, which bugs me). --I believe neither is true Christianity.

Sarah Palin at the Iowa Freedom Summit 1/24/2015
Click Here to view the YouTube.

 

Sarah Palin spoke to people who love her and hang on her every word. She earned her pay that day. She did a great job. Unfortunately, that's really all it was, a job, a job she gets paid well for.

There was a day that I hung on her every word too. That day was before I learned of her supporting RINO politicians, like Mitt Romney. This was also when I realized that she had wrongly convinced many of us conservatives to trust John McCain. --I was not happy about this revelation.

Even people who do not like my views and beliefs, if they know me long enough, eventually come to know that I am consistent and do not waver for anyone.

Sarah Palin may talk a great talk and say all the "right" things on the issues, but when it comes down to it, she will support anyone who is not a Democrat. I have a problem with such blind support. If she is going to speak on the issues, then she should use those issues when it comes to choosing who she will support. An "R" or an "I" by a person's name should NOT be the deciding factor.

Bottom line, it does no good that Sarah Palin knows and can say all the "right" things on the issues that people on the right believe and want, if she is not going to truly stand for such "right" things when it comes to who she supports. Basically, she's all talk.

And on an extra note: I do not believe she is really going to run for office. I believe she is just using the election seasons to get more speech engagements and to sell more books. This is her job, the way she earns mega-dollars.

Obama Interviewed By Three YouTube "Stars"
Click Here to view the YouTube interviews.

 

Unlike most people, I watched the entire video with all three interviews. Here is how I feel about it.

I don't think there was a thing wrong with doing the interviews. All three people handled themselves very well. Sure GloZell Green messed up a little, but I'm sure nerves had to have played a part. And obviously the questions were all approved ahead of time, as it was clear Obama had his answers prepared, which is understandable. I guess. No big deal.

What I noticed was that GloZell Green and Hank Green (no relation to each other) both came with liberal views and together allowed Obama to speak on two highly explosive topics from his liberal agenda quite easily. There was no rebuttal, no one taking the conservative side that could ask a challenging follow-up question. However, the other questions by all three interviewers were actually quite fair and down the middle.

Though it would have been much better had there been a voiced conservative to ask a couple solid conservative questions, overall it was put together well and tastefully done.

All-in-all I hope that if and when we get a true conservative in office that he/she will not hesitate to use the same type of platform to get information out there to people on the internet
.

 My Marriage Proposal
Liberals did not like it.


I "proposed" the following ideas on a mainstream blog. It turned out liberals do not really want what they call "marriage equality" for homosexuals. They were not happy with my truly equal proposal. 

Below is what I proposed:
.

1 - Do away with marriage licenses. Get the government out of our personal business.
2 - Recognize just the CLAIM of two consenting adults to be married, no matter who they are. This allows people to make their own decisions of right and wrong for them.
3 - The government should allow any legal benefits to any such CLAIMS of marriage. 

4 - The government should NOT force the recognition of any marriage on anyone in society, businesses included. Everyone should have the right to say NO to participating. 
5 - Schools should leave the teaching of "what is a family" to parents at home.
6 - Schools should not allow children to talk about any type of sexuality, but rather just teach them academics. 

7 - The government should not interfere in the raising of people's children, homosexual parents or heterosexual parents. 

NOTE: We've never needed licenses to have children. We simply obtain a birth certificate showing proof of a birth. And yet we always have had legal rights as parents and children. 

NOTE: 3 - "The government should allow any legal benefits to any such CLAIMS of marriage." -- YES people would STILL have ALL legal rights of a marriage.

FOX News - Why I Don't Watch It
That's Right.

 

I wish that more conservatives would recognize that FOX News is in the business of making money. I personally believe FOX News does what it does to play us conservatives, and that we would do well to know this and to keep it in mind. 

For example, Hannity and Colmes was put together just for the fight. Often Colmes did not even know what he was talking about. He was just playing a part on a show. Then there is Megyn Kelly who is not a conservative and has come out and admitted such, by saying she has never claimed to be one.  It would simply do our side well if we know who it is that we are getting information from. Even though the other news sources are recognized for being liberal, I would rather listen to them and not be fooled. --Then I know to take anything they say and do my own homework to learn "the rest of the story." Sometimes I can learn a lot by listening to a mainstream story, because I am keen to their usual slant and as with listening to a lying child, I can figure out the truth in-between what they are saying. They usually slip somewhere and give it away.

Basically, I do what a judge does, when listening to the news. I assume everyone is giving their slant and do not fully believe any of them, and I get to the truth on my own
.

Could I Vote For Ted Cruz
Let's think about this.

 

Born in Canada to an American mother and a Cuban father, Ted Cruz is an American, a Cuban, and a Canadian. He has formally renounce his Canadian citizenship and I have no idea if he is considered to be officially a Cuban, as I do not know Cuban law.

I have tried to get to the bottom of what a natural born citizen is in the U.S. And I have concluded the term must have been common knowledge back then, so much so that our founding fathers did not define it. It has become clear to me that this is a term that can only be looked at logically today, as no one can honestly say he/she has the absolute definition of it. With that said, my opinion of what it means is just that, my opinion. And my opinion makes sense to me, as that which is in the best interest of our country. I believe that a natural born citizen is a person who was born here and whose parents were born here as well.

When a person is born in another country, and or his/her parent(s) was/were born in another country, there is a strong possibility there will be an allegiance problem towards our country. And it is not good to have a president whose allegiance is not fully to our country. We have seen this with Obama. At the very least, we know for a fact that his father was not born here.

Ted Cruz might have an allegiance fully to our country. But because I believe as I believe about the meaning of a natural born citizen, I have to apply that belief across the board to everyone. With that said, now here comes the kicker. Though I believe Cruz does not qualify, since they allowed Obama into that office, I have NO problem ignoring this belief of mine and pulling a lever for this fine Southern Baptist Republican who appears to love this country very much and far more than any liberal Democrat that runs for office ever would. If they are going to put a person on the ballot who in my opinion does not qualify, it is my choice to ignore such and still vote for that person.

Guns & Alcohol
Let's be reasonable here.

 

The second amendment needs to be protected. However with that comes responsibility that should be mandatory to be taught to gun owners on a regular basis. Gun safety and gun dangers and gun lessons should just as extensively be taught to regular citizens who own guns, as these things are taught to cops. Also, people should be encouraged to only have a gun if the need for a gun outweighs the dangers of having one. 

With that said, I just cannot understand why people who are against guns are not equally against alcohol, which kills 20 times as many people in accident-related automobile deaths each year in the country and injures approximately 345,000, from scrapes to loss of limbs to parallelizations. 

It takes just one drink to impair a person's judgement, then the person can drink another and another and another and then get behind the wheel of a car and kill someone. Okay, we most likely cannot outlaw alcohol, but could we not do what we can do in trying to get people to stop drinking all on their own and make drinking a shameful thing to do? 

I challenge people who are wanting more strict gun laws (or to fully outlaw guns) to also speak just as strongly against alcohol. If such people cannot, then they cannot honestly say that they are going after guns for the sake of saving lives.


2014 News Page: Click Here

Home



© Debra J.M. Smith