This page is added to as
NY Times Columnist ‘Fuming’ after Son
Allegedly Stopped by Yale Cops at Gunpoint -- Here We Go
Okay, I get it. I really do get it. This
is his son. I would be fuming too, if a child of mine was
stopped at gunpoint by cops, mistaken for someone else. But
can we please have some honesty here?
This man, Charles
Blow said his third year Yale student son was accosted at
gunpoint by a Yale policeman because his son fit the
description of a suspect. He said his son was let go when the
cops realized his son was a college student and not a
criminal. Along with other comments, Charles Blow said on
Twitter, "This is exactly why I have NO PATIENCE for ppl
trying to convince me that the fear these young blk men feel
First off this is not just a black thing.
Whites have been mistakenly arrested at gunpoint too in this
country. Secondly why doesn't this man get angry at the many
blacks who do terrible things and make it hard on blacks? Does
he really not realize that people do look very much alike to
other races? Yes, there's going to be mistakes made like this.
It doesn't make it racist.
And what about the fact that
many people are scared of black men? How about how we feel,
when we have to keep our car windows up and doors locked, when
driving in the city, because of blacks killing people day and
night in our cities? Let's talk fear!
Also for the
record: I have no patience for people who wonder why cops fear
black men. Let's be real and try some
Government Pensions Are NOT Taxed In
New York State:
This is while others are.
New York & U.S. government employees do not pay NY
State income tax on government pensions. The state did not
want teachers paying state tax on theirs, so to be "fair" all
government pensions are not taxed by NY. --Other New Yorkers
have to pay the tax. Where is the equal
Info source: Click Here Talk about it on Facebook:
York State Governor Wants More Money For
The New York Constitution states
that the state legislature shall "provide for the maintenance
and support of a system of free common schools, wherein all
the children of this state may be educated." --No where does
it say there shall be a blank check to do whatever the heck
they want to do with our tax dollars. But that's what has
happened. They are taking our tax money and flushing it down
the toilet that we call "public schooling".
The state constitution does not say the
state shall pay for breakfast, lunches, after school programs,
sports, music, theater, clubs, political agendas, and all
other fluff. It does not say that it will pay teachers
ridiculously high wages for nine months of work and high
nontaxable pensions. It does not say that public schools
should be built like resorts, with swimming pools and tennis
courts, etc. And it absolutely does NOT say that children MUST
attend or that the state can govern over other types of
education, like home schooling.
New York State's education "system" has
run-a-muck. It is totally out of control. Putting more money
into a system that is already broken is only continuing an
irresponsible behavior by this state.
And teachers should get paid as per
their ability to actually educate the students and get fired
at anytime if they prove to no longer be able to do such.
Schools are supposed to be for the children, not the
Abortion on demand says some
people are not as important as others and are dispensable.
Ignorance causes people to not realize a baby in the womb is a
real life, a human being. A fetus is a developing young in the
uterus, the unborn offspring in the post-embryonic stage, in
humans from nine weeks after fertilization until birth. Slave
owners justified killing black slaves by saying black slaves
were not human. And it was actually LEGAL to kill the slaves.
Killing babies is not a
Sexuality & Marriage
(Straight Talk) - With all the talk about sexuality
and marriage, it only seemed right that I have an article
that takes on this topic. This is especially with all the
distortion that goes on in the world about these two things:
At Fault For Some Black Kids Going Bad
group is largely to blame for a black kid growing up to do
something so terrible, as to attack a cop, it is the liberals.
Liberals tell black
kids that they are victims of whites and of cops. And they
drill it into the kids' heads, to the point that many of these
kids end up filled with so much hate for whites and for cops.
When you mix this with
the free handouts and telling these kids that they are
entitled to that which other people earn, it is the perfect
recipe for creating very bad young adults.
these kids, all so that they will grow up and vote for
liberals. So if you want to place blame on someone other than
the black perpetrators in these situations, put the blame on
liberals for manipulating their minds during their formative
years on this earth. --And start with liberal public
Republicans Set To
Run Three Unqualified People
Republicans getting set to have three men run who are NOT
"natural" born citizens? A natural born citizen is someone who
was born here and whose parents were born here. THIS is why
Obama did not qualify, even IF he was born in America, because
his father was not born here. And yet three Republicans are
getting set to run (one again) who do not qualify.
Romney and Bobby Jindal were both born here, yes. But Romney's
father was born in Mexico, to parents who grew up there. And
Jindal's parents were both born in India. And Ted Cruz was
born in Canada. Now I realize his mother was born in the U.S.,
and this makes Ted Cruz an American. But I do not believe such
makes him a "Natural Born Citizen," because he was not
actually born here and his father was not born here. But
could I vote for Ted Cruz? See the right of this page for that
And for those of you who DON'T agree
with me on what natural born citizen means and believe that a
person simply has to have been born here, ask yourselves how
you feel about some illegal immigrant coming here and popping
out a Mexican flag waving anchor baby and that child growing
up to be president.
Gov. Rick Perry and Sen. Rand Paul
are the only two that look good for the Republican nomination
to me. Don't even get me started on Jeb Bush!
Lesbian Rachel Maddow Claims American
Fired Evangelist Bryan Fischer
Click Here to view
Here's how I see the following
Brian Fischer issues:
1) He was not fired from
AFA. He simply no longer holds the title of Director of
Issues Analysis. But he does still host the radio show,
Focal Point on American Family Radio. Hence, he was not
fired. But he was pretty-much thrown under the bus
though, something not uncommon to happen to people in
the right-wing movement.
2) His comments about
Hitler and homosexuals were not saying that the
Holocaust did not happen. Nor were the comments saying
that the Nazis did not exist. His comments were saying
that he believes Hitler found homosexual men to do most
of the killing of the Jews, that he believes Hitler
found homosexual men to have no problem committing such
terrible acts on humans. -- I have no comment on this,
because though I realize some homosexuals are very cruel
and that some of them are the worst bullies I've ever
encountered, I have no idea Hitler used them in such a
3) When he speaks of the first amendment to
the U.S. Constitution being for Christianity, he is
simply meaning that was what our founding fathers were
referring to with the first amendment. And that is what
they were referring to, Christianity. However the U.S.
Government and the Courts have clearly extended such to
other faith beliefs. And I assume he realizes this and
is not out to change our current situation of religious
freedom for all religions.
4) Another thing I
found online claims that he does not believe AIDS is
contracted through sex, but rather only through drug
use. I disagree with him on this.
5) And finally
something else I found is that while he considers
Mormonism to not be true Christianity, he has no problem
with the biggest cult, Catholicism (he shares the
latter, at least, in common with the president of AFA,
which bugs me). --I believe neither is true
Sarah Palin at the Iowa Freedom Summit
Click Here to view
Sarah Palin spoke to people who
love her and hang on her every word. She earned her pay
that day. She did a great job. Unfortunately, that's
really all it was, a job, a job she gets paid well
There was a day that I hung on her every
word too. That day was before I learned of her
supporting RINO politicians, like Mitt Romney. This was
also when I realized that she had wrongly convinced many
of us conservatives to trust John McCain. --I was not
happy about this revelation.
Even people who do
not like my views and beliefs, if they know me long
enough, eventually come to know that I am consistent and
do not waver for anyone.
Sarah Palin may talk a
great talk and say all the "right" things on the issues,
but when it comes down to it, she will support anyone
who is not a Democrat. I have a problem with such
blind support. If she is going to speak on the issues,
then she should use those issues when it comes to
choosing who she will support. An "R" or an "I" by a
person's name should NOT be the deciding
Bottom line, it does no good that Sarah
Palin knows and can say all the "right" things on the
issues that people on the right believe and want, if she
is not going to truly stand for such "right" things when
it comes to who she supports. Basically, she's all
And on an extra note: I do not believe she
is really going to run for office. I believe she is just
using the election seasons to get more speech
engagements and to sell more books. This is her job, the
way she earns
Obama Interviewed By Three YouTube
Click Here to view
Unlike most people, I watched the entire video
with all three interviews. Here is how I feel about
think there was a thing wrong with doing the interviews.
All three people handled themselves very well. Sure
GloZell Green messed up a little, but I'm sure nerves
had to have played a part. And obviously the questions
were all approved ahead of time, as it was clear Obama
had his answers prepared, which is understandable. I
guess. No big deal.
What I noticed was that GloZell Green and Hank
Green (no relation to each other) both came with liberal
views and together allowed Obama to speak on two
highly explosive topics from his liberal agenda quite
easily. There was no rebuttal, no one taking the
conservative side that could ask a challenging follow-up
question. However, the other questions by all three
interviewers were actually quite fair and down the
Though it would have been much better had
there been a voiced conservative to ask a couple solid
conservative questions, overall it was put together well
and tastefully done.
All-in-all I hope that if and when we get
a true conservative in office that he/she will not
hesitate to use the same type of platform to get
information out there to people on the
Liberals did not like
I "proposed" the following ideas on a
mainstream blog. It turned out liberals do not really
want what they call "marriage equality" for homosexuals.
They were not happy with my truly equal proposal.
Below is what I proposed:
1 - Do away with marriage licenses.
Get the government out of our personal business.
Recognize just the CLAIM of two consenting adults to be
married, no matter who they are. This allows people to
make their own decisions of right and wrong for them.
3 - The government should allow any legal benefits
to any such CLAIMS of marriage.
4 - The
government should NOT force the recognition of any
marriage on anyone in society, businesses included.
Everyone should have the right to say NO to
5 - Schools should leave the
teaching of "what is a family" to parents at home.
- Schools should not allow children to talk about any
type of sexuality, but rather just teach them
7 - The government should not
interfere in the raising of people's children,
homosexual parents or heterosexual parents.
NOTE: We've never needed licenses to have
children. We simply obtain a birth certificate showing
proof of a birth. And yet we always have had legal
rights as parents and children.
NOTE: 3 -
"The government should allow any legal benefits to any
such CLAIMS of marriage." -- YES people would STILL have
ALL legal rights of a
FOX News - Why I Don't Watch
that more conservatives would recognize that FOX News is
in the business of making money. I personally believe
FOX News does what it does to play us conservatives, and
that we would do well to know this and to keep it in
For example, Hannity and Colmes was
put together just for the fight. Often Colmes did not
even know what he was talking about. He was just playing
a part on a show. Then there is Megyn Kelly who is not a
conservative and has come out and admitted such, by
saying she has never claimed to be one. It would
simply do our side well if we know who it is that we are
getting information from. Even though the other news
sources are recognized for being liberal, I would rather
listen to them and not be fooled. --Then I know to take
anything they say and do my own homework to learn "the
rest of the story." Sometimes I can learn a lot by
listening to a mainstream story, because I am keen to
their usual slant and as with listening to a lying
child, I can figure out the truth in-between what they
are saying. They usually slip somewhere and give it
Basically, I do what a judge does, when
listening to the news. I assume everyone is giving their
slant and do not fully believe any of them, and I get to
the truth on my
Vote For Ted Cruz
Let's think about
Born in Canada
to an American mother and a Cuban father, Ted Cruz is an
American, a Cuban, and a Canadian. He has formally
renounce his Canadian citizenship and I have no idea if
he is considered to be officially a Cuban, as I do
not know Cuban law.
I have tried to get to the bottom of what
a natural born citizen is in the U.S. And I have concluded the term must have been
common knowledge back then, so much so that our founding
fathers did not define it. It has become clear to me
that this is a term that can only be looked at logically
today, as no one can honestly say he/she has the
absolute definition of it. With that said, my opinion of
what it means is just that, my opinion. And my opinion
makes sense to me, as that which is in the best interest
of our country. I believe that a natural born citizen is
a person who was born here and whose parents were born
here as well.
When a person is born
in another country, and or his/her parent(s) was/were
born in another country, there is a strong possibility
there will be an allegiance problem towards our country.
And it is not good to have a president whose
allegiance is not fully to our country. We
have seen this with Obama. At the very least, we know
for a fact that his father was not born here.
Ted Cruz might have
an allegiance fully to our country. But because I
believe as I believe about the meaning of a natural born
citizen, I have to apply that belief across the board to
everyone. With that said, now here comes the kicker.
Though I believe Cruz does not qualify, since they
allowed Obama into that office, I have NO problem
ignoring this belief of mine and pulling a lever for
this fine Southern Baptist Republican who appears to
love this country very much and far more than any
liberal Democrat that runs for office ever
would. If they are going to put a person on the ballot
who in my opinion does not qualify, it is my choice to
ignore such and still vote for that
Let's be reasonable
The second amendment needs to be
protected. However with that comes responsibility that
should be mandatory to be taught to gun owners on a
regular basis. Gun safety and gun dangers and gun
lessons should just as extensively be taught to regular
citizens who own guns, as these things are taught to
cops. Also, people should be encouraged to only have a
gun if the need for a gun outweighs the dangers of
With that said, I just cannot
understand why people who are against guns are not
equally against alcohol, which kills 20 times as many
people in accident-related automobile deaths each year
in the country and injures approximately 345,000, from
scrapes to loss of limbs to parallelizations.
It takes just one drink to impair a person's
judgement, then the person can drink another and another
and another and then get behind the wheel of a car and
kill someone. Okay, we most likely cannot outlaw
alcohol, but could we not do what we can do in trying to
get people to stop drinking all on their own and make
drinking a shameful thing to do?
challenge people who are wanting more strict gun laws
(or to fully outlaw guns) to also speak just as strongly
against alcohol. If such people cannot, then they
cannot honestly say that they are going after guns
for the sake of saving
2014 News Page: Click