|
Newsletter
Page
2015
A Change --
Many
things have happened since I first got online fifteen years
ago, one of which was this website that began ten years ago.
More and more I am feeling less and less into this
work.
It is not that I don't want to do it at
all, but just far less. And I am starting by ending my
Newsletter page and just working on bringing my website to
where I want it to be, to stand the test of
time.
Eventually I plan on moving my site over to
InformingChristians.com and having DebraJMSmith.com point to
that site, instead of the other way around, which it is
now. I just think it's time.
The Only "Just Tissue"
Is What's
Between The Baby And The Outside
World
Defend
Life
|
|
What
Are Homosexual Activists Going To Do
Next
Mark my words. Homosexuals will go
after the churches next, for being nonprofits that
discriminate against homosexuals, saying that nonprofits
cannot discriminate and keep their nonprofit
status.
Then when churches that discriminate can no
longer have a nonprofit status, they will have to run as
businesses. And in many states (soon all) businesses cannot
discriminate. Rock meet Hard-place.
SCOTUS 5-4 Bad Homosexual
"Marriage" Decision
It's a done deal. --We conservatives need to
let this homosexual "marriage" issue go.
There are too
many bad people on both sides of the aisle of congress to do
anything about what has happened. This is on their heads, on
the heads of many state lawmakers, and on the heads of those
five liberal justices.
What now needs to be done by
biblical Christians: We true biblical Christian conservatives
need to protect our own from homosexuals. We need to use our
freedoms that we do still have to protect our own. And we
cannot count on lawmakers to do anything to help us, because
there are simply not enough willing to.
1 - Protect our
children. Do not allow them to get at your children. Home
school is best.
2 - Protect your businesses by wearing your
Christianity on your sleeve, quite literally. By this I mean,
incorporate your Christian faith into all that you do by
placing scripture right on your work and on your clothing that
you work in. Basically, become such an offense to them, that
they would not want you at their events.
3 - Stop talking
to any of them, unless you are telling them what they are
doing is wrong and pointing them to Jesus Christ and telling
them to repent. Do not be friends or family on any level with
them. If you have to work with them, just be business minded
with them and treat them as any others as far as business
goes. Do not be rude. Be courteous. But do not see them
outside of work. Keep it business.
4 - We need to wear our
Christianity on our sleeve. It should be very clear that we
are biblical Christians. When we do it right, the wicked will
flee from us. They won't want to be around us, not because of
cruelty (don't be cruel), but rather because of doing good. We
need to shine our light in the darkness. They run from the
light.
Yes, we need to protect ourselves with the light
of Jesus. They run from that light.
No Obama
Cannot Call For Marial Law In The United
States
The closest thing our U.S. Constitution
has to martial law is the habeas corpus clause, which states,
"The privilege of the writ of habeas corpus shall not be
suspended, unless when in cases of rebellion or invasion the
public safety may require it." And this falls under Section 9
- Powers Forbidden to Congress, which means it is forbidden
for congress to suspend habeas corpus unless when in a case of
rebellion or invasion, because the public safety may require
it. In other words, congress can do this. The constitution
says nothing about the president.
Habeas corpus
basically puts the courts over law-enforcement in this
country. So if it is suspended (which means not forever, but
for a while), the courts for that time would not be over
law-enforcement. This is not to say that the courts could not
do something about people in law-enforcement who knowingly did
wrong during such a period of time. Because the courts could
absolutely do such afterwards, and such would be
known.
Other than Habeas corpus in the U.S.
Constitution from what I have found is there have been some
court decisions handed down between the Civil War and World
War II that limited martial law in the U.S. And Congress
passed the Posse Comitatus Act in 1878, which forbids any
military involvement in domestic law enforcement without
congressional approval. --Info Source: Wikipedia
So
basically Obama cannot do anything on his own. He would need
the approval of congress and that is not going to
happen.
Threats To American Lives Today -
Medical Society & Drunks
Radical Islam,
though a serious issue, is not what's killing hundreds of
thousands of Americans. Drunk driving and medical errors are.
1) In 2013, 10,076 people died in drunk driving
crashes - one every 52 minutes - and 290,000 were injured in
drunk driving crashes. 2) On average, two in three people will
be involved in a drunk driving crash in their lifetime.
--Source: http://www.madd.org/statistics/
1)
In 1999, Americans learned that 98,000 people were dying every
year from preventable errors in hospitals. 2) According to a
new study just out from the prestigious Journal of Patient
Safety, four times as many people die from preventable medical
errors than we thought, as many as 440,000 a year.
--Source: http://www.forbes.com/sites/leahbinder/2013/09/23/stunning-news-on-preventable-deaths-in-hospitals/
Conservatives need to learn how to
handle rough interviews.
If they are against
the homosexual agenda, they need to boldly say so. If they are
against abortion, they need to boldly say so. If they are pro
America, pro the second amendment, pro the working class, they
need to say so. If they are against able-bodied people living
off of the system, they need to say so. If they are for
privatizing Social Security, encouraging schooling choice, and
promoting the smallest form of government in this country that
is the family, they need to say these things boldly. --And the
list could go....The bottom line is that they need to stand up
for what they supposedly believe. And when liberal news people
act all shocked and try to shame them, they need to tell those
liberals that if they want a liberal, then vote for a liberal,
but that they are conservatives.
Biblical
Churches Be Careful - Liberal Churches No Need
To -- Biblical Christian churches are always
having to be careful not to get too political because of their
tax-free status. This is while liberal "churches" like the Unitarian "churches"
do whatever they want.
The United Universalist
Association online site (http://www.uua.org/) had a page that told how they go about getting
what they want. The site boasted of an alliance having been
formed with Sarah Weddington and Linda Coffee, lawyers in the
Roe VS Wade case. The site said the alliance enabled the two
young lawyers to bring the case to the Supreme Court. [See
quote below.]
“For example, support for the famous Roe
v. Wade court case came out of a study group set up by the
Women's Alliance in the First Unitarian Church of Dallas, TX.
This group took over a year to study the issues concerning the
availability of services for abortion. In the spring of 1970
the Roe v. Wade case was heard in Dallas, brought by attorneys
Linda Coffee and Sarah Weddington. Both were recent law school
graduates. Members of the congregation met them at the Fifth
Circuit Court hearing. A loving supportive alliance was formed
that enabled these young lawyers to bring this case to the
Supreme Court.” (Quote from UUA-March, 2003 Handbook Page 91)
http://www.debrajmsmith.com/03_2003_UUA_Handbook.pdf
The biblical Christian church needs to
get smart and be clever as a
serpent, as scripture instructs us to be. We are
always hearing about the other part of that verse, on how
gentle we are to be. But we are also called to be clever. We
should start calling the fight against abortion "Social
Justice," justice for the unborn. And we should call the fight
against perversion, "Social Justice," justice for the innocent
people with morals.
Also, we
should do what the serpent is doing when it comes to
donations, being a 501C3. And that would be in this case the
ACLU. The ACLU actually has two organizations. One is a 501C3,
while the other is not. This gives their donators tax
write-offs when donations are made to the 501C3 organization,
while giving the ACLU total free speech to get as political as
they want to be in the other organization. Churches could have
the running of the actual church NOT be a 501C3, while having
their outreach (which would include their missionary work) be
a 501C3. --Then the people in the churches could be educated
on where to donate their money. IF they are able to file a
schedule A on their taxes, they can donate to the 501C3. If
not, they could donate to the running of the church. This
would open up churches to have total free speech inside their
churches. (Many people are not able to file a schedule A to
begin with because they don't have enough write-offs to add up
to more than the standard deduction, and as a result cannot
write off their church donations.)
Do
NOT Insult Michelle Obama's Big Butt -- And
that's the truth! A main stream blog removed a comment of mine
that implied Michelle Obama's rear is big. The site posted an
article about a man who appeared to have compared
Michelle Obama's face to an ape on The Planet Of The
Apes. Though my one comment said I think she looks more like
Pat Benatar, my other comment implied her rear to
be the size of the female ape's rear. It was a joke, a
silly.
But everything against the Obama's is viewed as
racist on some blogs. Honestly, who are the racists,
but those who see everything about blacks to be offensive
towards blacks. Instead of seeing my comment as simply saying
she has a big rear, which she does, it was seen as me saying
she looks like an ape.
The site removed the comment and
now some moron is following me around the site claiming that I
compared Michelle Obama to an ape.
The
following leads to a picture of my Diqus
account profile history and shows the terrible
awful racist comment: Click Here
How
Race Wars Get Started -- This is how race wars get
started:
Narcissistic Sociopaths in one race decide
they are superior to another race. They degrade the other
race, demonize the other race and make rules for the other
race that their own race does not have to follow.
The
Narcissistic Sociopaths self-segregate themselves from that
other race, due to disgust with the other race, hate, and an
over-all need to keep their own race
"racially-pure."
The Narcissistic Sociopaths will even
live off of the work, the labor of people in that other race
and feel they have a right to do such. This is because they
feel the other race is despicable and not worthy of fair
treatment. They will steal from that other race and physically
harm many of them, with no remorse, because the other race has
been dehumanized in their minds.
The Narcissistic
Sociopaths will even accomplish gaining people from the other
race over to their side. The weaker people in the other race
go over to the side of the Narcissistic Sociopaths out of fear
and a need to feel safe from any harm coming to them. (It's
the bully syndrome.) --Such people sell their own race
out.
Eventually the abused race gets angry. Some of
them come to a point of mocking the aggressive race in
private. And oh, if it gets found out, they will have hell to
pay! Then eventually they come out of hiding and fight
back!
Yes, I can see how race wars
begin.
MSNBC
Melissa Harris-Perry at Cornell: Hopes Trayvon Martin 'whooped
the shit out of George Zimmerman' - Video Click Here
And that, ladies and gentlemen is a racist!
--Melissa Harris-Perry's judgement of the situation is based
solely on skin color, on race.
She does not know
that Trayvon was fighting for his life because he was killed.
That is saying that there is no such thing as killing in
self-defense. Would she say such if Trayvon had killed George,
that George was just trying to defend himself and that proof
was that Trayvon killed George? Nonsense. Of course not.
She's saying it is okay for a black to defend himself,
but not for another race to do so. How do we know that
this woman is a racist? Because the evidence, the physical
evidence proved that Trayvon attacked George and the attack
proved that George had good cause to be concerned about the
stranger wondering around outside at night on the apartment
complex grounds. And it showed that George had good cause to
believe he was going to die from having his head bashed into a
sidewalk.
She went off of skin color. She did
not know Trayvon or anything else about him, other than that
he was black. And she totally ignored the physical evidence
and that George was found innocent and even the department of
justice could not find cause against him. Yes, this black
woman is a racist, as bad as any white racist out there.
And Trayvon Martin does NOT represent the black race.
He represents what's wrong in many families in this country,
that many people are not raising their children right. It's
not a skin color issue. It's an issue of the heart. And hearts
are all the same color.
Another Business Owner About To Lose
Everything Because She Turned Down A Homosexual
"Wedding"
I have a hard time feeling sorry for
this woman, because she still calls the homosexual who she
turned down, "Friend." Yes, she says she still thinks the
world of him. What's that!
Scripture asks what darkness
has in common with light. The answer is nothing. The man is
costing her everything she has, yet she foolishly
still calls him her friend.
The story can be found
here: Click Here
People
need to smarten up and just do the monsters' "weddings."
--Business owners can speak up and say they are
doing it in distress. They can say they are only
doing it because the law says they have to, a type of
disclaimer. But they need to just do the stupid events and
know that God is very aware that they are being forced to
do it by a tyrannical government.
Seriously, and then
these homosexuals wonder why they are
hated!
Obama Said,
Extremists Have "Legitimate Grievances"
A
February 15, 2015 LA Times article by Obama said the
following:
"Governments that deny human rights play
into the hands of extremists who claim that violence is the
only way to achieve change. Efforts to counter violent
extremism will only succeed if citizens can address legitimate
grievances through the democratic process and express
themselves through strong civil societies. Those efforts must
be matched by economic, educational and entrepreneurial
development so people have hope for a life of
dignity."
Does The
14th Amendment Support Homosexual
Marriage:
Amendment 14 - Citizenship Rights
(ratified July 9, 1868) All persons born or naturalized in the
United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are
citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they
reside. No state shall make or enforce any law, which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United
States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life,
liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to
any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the
laws.
The 14th amendment says we are all due equal
protection of the laws. It is not saying we can change
meanings of words in order to get current laws to mean
something else.
The U.S. Constitution is a contract, a
legal contract. And a legal contract is a meeting of the
minds. The meetings of the minds is what makes a contract
legal. If there is no meeting of the minds, then a contract is
not legal. This is why the U.S. Constitution is not a "living"
document. It does not change with whatever someone can twist
it to mean. It means what it meant to those whose minds met,
back when it and each amendment were ratified. And with this
would be the meanings of words, meanings that words had at the
time of the ratifications.
So, no, the 14th amendment
does not defend marriage outside of one man and one woman. But
it does defend a person's right (a business owner's right) to
turn someone down, to choose not to do business with someone.
We have a right in this country to say "no" to that which goes
against our faith beliefs. And any law that abridges us from
our privileges or immunities is not to be enforced.
So
if anything the 14th amendment protects Christians from that
which goes against our faith, from us being forced (by way of
a law) to participate in anything of the
such.
|
|
NY Times Columnist ‘Fuming’ after Son
Allegedly Stopped by Yale Cops at Gunpoint -- Here We Go
Again
Okay, I get it. I really do get it. This
is his son. I would be fuming too, if a child of mine was
stopped at gunpoint by cops, mistaken for someone else. But
can we please have some honesty here?
This man, Charles
Blow said his third year Yale student son was accosted at
gunpoint by a Yale policeman because his son fit the
description of a suspect. He said his son was let go when the
cops realized his son was a college student and not a
criminal. Along with other comments, Charles Blow said on
Twitter, "This is exactly why I have NO PATIENCE for ppl
trying to convince me that the fear these young blk men feel
isn't real."
First off this is not just a black thing.
Whites have been mistakenly arrested at gunpoint too in this
country. Secondly why doesn't this man get angry at the many
blacks who do terrible things and make it hard on blacks? Does
he really not realize that people do look very much alike to
other races? Yes, there's going to be mistakes made like this.
It doesn't make it racist.
And what about the fact that
many people are scared of black men? How about how we feel,
when we have to keep our car windows up and doors locked, when
driving in the city, because of blacks killing people day and
night in our cities? Let's talk fear!
Also for the
record: I have no patience for people who wonder why cops fear
black men. Let's be real and try some
honesty!
Government Pensions Are NOT Taxed In
New York State:
This is while others are.
New York & U.S. government employees do not pay NY
State income tax on government pensions. The state did not
want teachers paying state tax on theirs, so to be "fair" all
government pensions are not taxed by NY. --Other New Yorkers
have to pay the tax. Where is the equal
protection?
Info source: Click Here Talk about it on Facebook:
Click
Here
New
York State Governor Wants More Money For
Education:
The New York Constitution states
that the state legislature shall "provide for the maintenance
and support of a system of free common schools, wherein all
the children of this state may be educated." --No where does
it say there shall be a blank check to do whatever the heck
they want to do with our tax dollars. But that's what has
happened. They are taking our tax money and flushing it down
the toilet that we call "public schooling".
The state constitution does not say the
state shall pay for breakfast, lunches, after school programs,
sports, music, theater, clubs, political agendas, and all
other fluff. It does not say that it will pay teachers
ridiculously high wages for nine months of work and high
nontaxable pensions. It does not say that public schools
should be built like resorts, with swimming pools and tennis
courts, etc. And it absolutely does NOT say that children MUST
attend or that the state can govern over other types of
education, like home schooling.
New York State's education "system" has
run-a-muck. It is totally out of control. Putting more money
into a system that is already broken is only continuing an
irresponsible behavior by this state.
And teachers should get paid as per
their ability to actually educate the students and get fired
at anytime if they prove to no longer be able to do such.
Schools are supposed to be for the children, not the
teachers.
Abortion on demand says some
people are not as important as others and are dispensable.
Ignorance causes people to not realize a baby in the womb is a
real life, a human being. A fetus is a developing young in the
uterus, the unborn offspring in the post-embryonic stage, in
humans from nine weeks after fertilization until birth. Slave
owners justified killing black slaves by saying black slaves
were not human. And it was actually LEGAL to kill the slaves.
Killing babies is not a
solution.
Sexuality & Marriage
(Straight Talk) - With all the talk about sexuality
and marriage, it only seemed right that I have an article
that takes on this topic. This is especially with all the
distortion that goes on in the world about these two things:
Click Here
Liberals Largely
At Fault For Some Black Kids Going Bad
If any
group is largely to blame for a black kid growing up to do
something so terrible, as to attack a cop, it is the liberals.
Liberals tell black
kids that they are victims of whites and of cops. And they
drill it into the kids' heads, to the point that many of these
kids end up filled with so much hate for whites and for cops.
When you mix this with
the free handouts and telling these kids that they are
entitled to that which other people earn, it is the perfect
recipe for creating very bad young adults.
Liberals brainwash
these kids, all so that they will grow up and vote for
liberals. So if you want to place blame on someone other than
the black perpetrators in these situations, put the blame on
liberals for manipulating their minds during their formative
years on this earth. --And start with liberal public
schools.
Republicans Set To
Run Three Unqualified People
Why are
Republicans getting set to have three men run who are NOT
"natural" born citizens? A natural born citizen is someone who
was born here and whose parents were born here. THIS is why
Obama did not qualify, even IF he was born in America, because
his father was not born here. And yet three Republicans are
getting set to run (one again) who do not qualify.
Mitt
Romney and Bobby Jindal were both born here, yes. But Romney's
father was born in Mexico, to parents who grew up there. And
Jindal's parents were both born in India. And Ted Cruz was
born in Canada. Now I realize his mother was born in the U.S.,
and this makes Ted Cruz an American. But I do not believe such
makes him a "Natural Born Citizen," because he was not
actually born here and his father was not born here. But
could I vote for Ted Cruz? See the right of this page for that
commentary.
And for those of you who DON'T agree
with me on what natural born citizen means and believe that a
person simply has to have been born here, ask yourselves how
you feel about some illegal immigrant coming here and popping
out a Mexican flag waving anchor baby and that child growing
up to be president.
Gov. Rick Perry and Sen. Rand Paul
are the only two that look good to me. Don't even get me
started on Jeb
Bush! | |
|
|
|
|
Laws Forcing Business
Owners To Do
Homosexual "Weddings"
There is an
anwer.
Those are bad laws. And as per the
U.S. Constitution should not be enforced. But as long a
they are being upheld, Christians who own businesses
that could be targeted by troublesome homosexuals need
to really put their Christianity into their
work.
Here's how it would work: Say I am a baker
of wedding cakes. My uniform that I will be wearing at
all times, including when the cake is delivered would
have written on it the words, "And Jesus answered and
said unto them, Have ye not read, that he which made
them at the beginning made them male and female..."
...Matthew 19:4
ALL wedding cakes would have a
special writing that goes around the side, up near the
top that says, "One Man, One Woman," over and over
again, all round the upper rim of the cake. This would
be very tastefully done, very pretty to look like part
of the decor on the cake. It could even be in the color
of cake icing. No matter how subtle, it would be there.
All of my figurine cake toppers would be one piece
male/female toppers, special made with our "One Man, One
Woman and the name of my store" logo on them. Other
toppers, like bells, would also come with that logo. (I
would not order special toppings. And ALL cakes must be
adorned with one, as such would be our
name/logo.)
Now mind you, that this would all be
done this way for EVERYONE, no discrimination. And such
would be right in the contract agreement that EVERYONE
has to agree in order to order a cake from my bakery.
And if a homosexual couple wanted to allow me to spread
some truth at their lie of a "wedding" I would bake that
cake and deliver it with a smile.
Here is video
from when I was on the Jimmy Z Show talking about this
topic: Click
Here |
|
The Confederate
Flag
The Civil
War
Yes, it was horrid that this
country ever had forced slavery. But to accuse every
person who fought for the South of fighting for slavery,
is absurd. The Civil War was the worst and most foolish
war this country ever fought. It pitted brother against
brother.
The Civil War was instigated by the
liberals of that day, the Democratic Party. Just as
liberals today put the needs of some so far above
others, that they fight to kill unborn babies, the
liberals back then believed that blacks were not human
either and fought to keep them in bondage as
slaves.
When Lincoln won the election, the
Democrats in the South were upset that not only would
they possibly be losing their slaves, but they felt they
had lost their representation. --This is because not a
single southern state went to Lincoln.
The
Democrats played on the latter, the loss of
representation and began the war. And just as many
liberals fall for the antics of the Democratic Party
today, many fell for their antics back then too. We see
this today, with a woman's "right to choose" to kill her
unborn baby. So many women have to live with what they
did, after they realize just what they did.
So
between being told that it was about representation and
the fact that they lived in the South, men fought for
the South.It was a terrible part of our history. But we
got through it. And they actually forgave each other and
the end of the war actually set the slaves
free.
After the war it became very understood
down south that the war was bad, that they were on the
wrong side of the war. But it was over and many of their
loved ones had died. And they knew that most of their
loved ones really believed they were doing the right
thing, fighting for representation and for the lives
(once the war began), not for slavery.
So now all
these years later, because of some 21 year-old psychotic
who goes in and shoots up a church, people want to make
all of those deaths in the south be equal to that of
Hitler's army. And these people think that the decedents
of the people who died in the South are going to just
let all that to happen, allow their ancestors names and
memories to be tarnished when most were not fighting to
keep slavery? Come on. Wake up.
The only reason
the confederate flag should be removed from government
land is because this is America, and another flag should
not be flown representing something opposing America on
government land, NOT because all the people were horrid
that fought in that war. And NOT to disrespect their
memories. All this other removal of the flag is just
bogus. And if a state wants it in their state flag and
or at a Civil War memorial that should be totally
fine. |
|
The
Charleston-Shooting
The Question: Where Was
God
Some people have asked if God was
asleep that night and asked why God did not stop the
shooter. I know I will take grief from both liberals and
conservatives for what I am about to say, but it is the
truth. And for those who are wondering, this is an
answer.
The bible tells Christians to "put the
wicked out" from among them/us. Christian churches are
too open to just letting anyone in them. Had this been a
closed and locked door bible study, these people would
still be alive.
I do not know a single church
that does this, but as per scripture, a gathering of the
saints is supposed to be just the saints. So when a
church gathering is not at least trying to make sure
that all who gather with them are true biblical
Christians, they are actually going against
scripture.
And I believe these people knew there
was something wrong with this guy and knew he was not
one of them. But all too often, Christians believe they
can win a person over to Christ and do not obey God by
putting the wicked out from among
them. |
|
The Duggar Family 19
Kids And Seriously Messed
up
My thoughts on the interview that can be
found here: Click
Here
He molested the girls before he was
14, confessed to his parents, and then proceeded to
molest them again and again and again, over the next
year, till he was 15.
He went from molesting them
over their clothing while they were asleep, to molesting
them under their clothing and while they were awake.
--Megyn Kelly did not push enough on the latter part of
this. She was way too soft on them.
Supposed
safeguards were put into place, though clearly not good
enough ones. And when he was 15 and went for a month of
a type of counseling outside of the home, he was then
allowed and trusted to live back home again (again with
these "safeguards.")
The parents were clearly far
more concerned about the abuser, than the victims.
Nothing was said about why the older of the girls did
not push him away and go tell on him, after they had
been alerted about what Josh had done while they were
sleeping and taught what bad-touch is. It supposedly was
always Josh who told on himself.
It appears to me
that Josh felt he could do anything, confess it, and go
do it again. The parents clearly played it all down,
even claiming in so many words that such is a common
thing in families. And they are very upset that what
they claim to have been sealed records were released. (I
had thought they were not sealed, but they say they were
sealed.)
Nothing was said about the local Social
Services investigation that took place, or the lawsuit
by Josh against that department.
And that they
did not say the obvious when questioned about their
stand against homosexuality, makes me wonder if they
truly realize the severity of what their son did. Their
response should have been that they did not go along
with what their son did either, that perversion was
wrong for their son too, not just homosexuals. But they
did not say this, which makes me think they still think
their son did not do anything close to being as bad a
thing as they believe homosexuals do.
The wife
sounds like she is on drugs, and she kept looking at the
husband as if to seek his approval of what she was
saying.The clip of the daughters' interview that will
air on Friday, sounds like they are faking, trying to
set up for a lawsuit against the city for the records
being released. (They did this, while seeming to play
down what their brother did to them. Very
odd.)
All in all, I think they are weird, nuts,
and in no way representatives of Christianity. And I
think Megyn Kelly dropped the ball and let way too much
slide. |
|
Rick Perry Caves On
Homosexual Marriage
Issue
When asked if he would attend a homosexual
marriage he said he "probably
would."
Homosexuality has become like the Mark Of The
Beast.
I believe the Democratic Party is
using the homosexual issue to win elections. If a
Republican answers a question on homosexuality in a
liberal minded way, that candidate loses some
conservative votes. If he/she answers it in a
conservative minded way, he/she loses some of the
moderate votes.But the Democratic Party would prefer the
Republican candidate answers any question on
homosexuality in a very conservative manner. The reason
being that the media eats such up and leaches onto that
Republican candidate and never lets up on the topic.
This causes a tremendous negative vibe for that
Republican candidate and does not leave room for any
other issue to be talked about by him/her.The only way
the Republicans can counter it, is to get the topic onto
the economy. Because if people cannot earn enough money
to live, all the moral issues seem to take a back seat.
And concerns about the economy crosses party lines. But
once the homosexual topic has painted a conservative as
a "hater" it is hard to get off of that topic and onto
anything else.As a result many Republicans are going
along with the homosexual agenda just enough to get the
topic off of homosexuality and onto the
economy.Basically, Perry tossed liberals the answer they
wanted, so that he could get back onto the topic of the
economy, which is what will inevitably be the real
deciding factor in this up-coming election. But he had
to take the homosexual "mark" in order to do
this. |
|
Homosexuality: Between Two
Consenting Adults -- Really?
Not!
It is being forced on
everyone.
Homosexuals have to bring all of us in
on what they are doing. They need laws to say what they
are doing is something other than what it really is.
They teach children in public schools to accept it. They
have manged to get large companies to force "sensitivity
training" on employees, designed to threaten job loss
without conformity. They harass business owners into
doing business with them and actually being party to
their homosexual events. Goodness, now they want to
become a protected class! How is what they are doing
just between two consenting adults, when school
children, employees, and business owners are being
forced on some level to go along with
them?
Homosexuality
And The Apocalyspe -- Ultimately homosexuality brings down any
society. And it absolutely is a sign of the very end
times that we are in today. Calling evil "good" and good
"evil," is spoken of in the bible, that such would
happen in the end times. As for the apocalypse, it is
coming and is due to all sin, not just the sin of
homosexuality.But I do feel that homosexuality is going
to be a very prevalent sin that much of society
embraces, leading up to and going through the
tribulation period and up to the apocalypse, possibly
second only to the rejection of Jesus Christ. And it is
quite possible that it will have something to do with
the antichrist and who knows, maybe even the true Mark
Of The
Beast. |
|
An Interview with A Ferguson
Protester
Click Here to view
the
video.
I
wish so badly that I could talk to this young man in
Ferguson. Honestly, he looks like a nice guy who simply
does not understand what the DOJ said about Brown's
death. It seems that this is a communication problem.
This young man, as with many people there truly believe
Mike Brown was gunned down for no good reason.
This really makes me sad. I wish I could reach
through this screen and hug that young man and speak to
him in a manner in which he could understand.He was
trying to tell Hannity that he does not understand what
Hannity was saying. And this does not mean he is dumb,
he simply doesn't understand and needs it explained in
terms that he can understand.
This entire mess
could be settled with one public speech from someone
that they trust, telling them the truth in a manner that
they can understand.I am not saying that because they
are black, they cannot easily understand what is being
said on the news. I am saying because they are not
educated enough they cannot understand what is being
said in the news. Most of them probably do not even
watch the news. They are just listening to what is said
on the streets. --So honestly, who can blame them for
being upset, believing what they are believing?
I
know, people are going to lash out at me for saying
this, but it has nothing to do with the color of the
skin. White, black, and brown uneducated people are not
going to grasp what is being said on the news.And
uneducated does NOT mean unintelligent. There are MANY
very intelligent people in this world, who to no fault
of their own are uneducated.
Sadly THIS is one
of the main reasons the Democratic Party seeks to keep
poor people on government handouts and living in cities
with poor public schools. An uneducated people is easily
lied to and manipulated. And right now, these protesters
are playing right into the hands of the D.C.
liberals.The D.C. liberals are going to use this in 2016
to anger the poorer people in this country from voting
republican. --D.C. liberals don't care about these
people. They are playing them like
puppets. |
|
Grace Is Being Called Hyper Grace
Today
Click Here to read
the
latest.
"Hyper Grace?" --Well that's a new
one. I wonder how Jesus would feel about Him saying "It
is finished," now being called "Hyper Grace."
His Grace is
sufficient. And yes, a true biblical born again
believing Christian's sins, past, present, and future
sins are all forgiven. It's a done deal. We are bought
and paid for. We are no longer our own. He who keeps us
will not slumber. We are sealed till the Day of
Redemption. For it is God who works in each and every
one of us to His will and
pleasure.
The life of a believer is all about
the work that God does in the believer. Yes, we make
choices. But any good that we do is because of the work
that God is doing in us. And the fact that we do not
"practice" sin (make sinning a practice), is because we
are new creations in Christ. --This is also all to God's
glory.
Do we still repent of sins that we
do? Yes. But there is only one repenting that us unto
salvation. My daughters are my daughters, forever and
always. Even if they forget to say "sorry" for something
they do against me, they still remain my daughters.
Our obedience to God is all to His
glory, not ours. It is all His doing in us, working
inside of us. When we read the Word of God, it works in
us like a surgeon's knife cutting out what is wrong. And
when we do sin and say sorry to God, it is because He
has shown us in His Word to repent and that our Father
forgives us. But just as we like our own children to say
"sorry" when wrong, and we don't hinge their place in
the family on such, God does not either.
Some might wonder, well what's to
stop a true Christian from sinning. Well, it is not
what, but who. And that "who" is God, Himself. Not only
does He work in us, He is also fully capable and most
certainly does chasten His own. --Not punish, but those
whom He loves, He chastens. Do not fret about this. All
due to His Grace, we are His own. His Grace truly is
sufficient.
When we became part of God's
family, it was a done deal. It is finished.
And Jesus is who finished
it. |
|
Obama: People Committed Terrible Deeds in
the Name of Christ During Crusades
"Prayer" Breakfast
2015
Click Here to view
the
YouTube.
The middle ages crusades and
inquisition were not done in the name of Christ. Nor
were they done by true biblical Christians. These things
were done by Roman Catholics, who during that time
killed any true biblical Christian who they got their
hands
on. |
|
2009 Nancy Pelosi On Obama Care
Tax/Jail-Time Fairness
Click Here to view
the
YouTube.
"Do you think it's fair if somebody
says, 'I'm just not going to have any and if I get sick
then I'll just go to the emergency room and send the
bill to you.'" --Nancy Pelosi responding Komo 4 News
(ABC Seattle) Reporter Shomari Stone's question on if
Pelosi thinks it is fair to send people to jail who do
not get health insurance. Due to the tax that will
result in jail-time for refusing to
pay. |
|
Lesbian Rachel Maddow Claims American
Family Association
Fired Evangelist Bryan Fischer
Click Here to view
the
YouTube.
Here's how I see the following
Brian Fischer issues:
1) He was not fired from
AFA. He simply no longer holds the title of Director of
Issues Analysis. But he does still host the radio show,
Focal Point on American Family Radio. Hence, he was not
fired. But he was pretty-much thrown under the bus
though, something not uncommon to happen to people in
the right-wing movement.
2) His comments about
Hitler and homosexuals were not saying that the
Holocaust did not happen. Nor were the comments saying
that the Nazis did not exist. His comments were saying
that he believes Hitler found homosexual men to do most
of the killing of the Jews, that he believes Hitler
found homosexual men to have no problem committing such
terrible acts on humans. -- I have no comment on this,
because though I realize some homosexuals are very cruel
and that some of them are the worst bullies I've ever
encountered, I have no idea Hitler used them in such a
way.
3) When he speaks of the first amendment to
the U.S. Constitution being for Christianity, he is
simply meaning that was what our founding fathers were
referring to with the first amendment. And that is what
they were referring to, Christianity. However the U.S.
Government and the Courts have clearly extended such to
other faith beliefs. And I assume he realizes this and
is not out to change our current situation of religious
freedom for all religions.
4) Another thing I
found online claims that he does not believe AIDS is
contracted through sex, but rather only through drug
use. I disagree with him on this.
5) And finally
something else I found is that while he considers
Mormonism to not be true Christianity, he has no problem
with the biggest cult, Catholicism (he shares the
latter, at least, in common with the president of AFA,
which bugs me). --I believe neither is true
Christianity. |
|
Sarah Palin at the Iowa Freedom Summit
1/24/2015
Click Here to view
the
YouTube.
Sarah Palin spoke to people who
love her and hang on her every word. She earned her pay
that day. She did a great job. Unfortunately, that's
really all it was, a job, a job she gets paid well
for.
There was a day that I hung on her every
word too. That day was before I learned of her
supporting RINO politicians, like Mitt Romney. This was
also when I realized that she had wrongly convinced many
of us conservatives to trust John McCain. --I was not
happy about this revelation.
Even people who do
not like my views and beliefs, if they know me long
enough, eventually come to know that I am consistent and
do not waver for anyone.
Sarah Palin may talk a
great talk and say all the "right" things on the issues,
but when it comes down to it, she will support anyone
who is not a Democrat. I have a problem with such
blind support. If she is going to speak on the issues,
then she should use those issues when it comes to
choosing who she will support. An "R" or an "I" by a
person's name should NOT be the deciding
factor.
Bottom line, it does no good that Sarah
Palin knows and can say all the "right" things on the
issues that people on the right believe and want, if she
is not going to truly stand for such "right" things when
it comes to who she supports. Basically, she's all
talk.
And on an extra note: I do not believe she
is really going to run for office. I believe she is just
using the election seasons to get more speech
engagements and to sell more books. This is her job, the
way she earns
mega-dollars. |
|
Obama Interviewed By Three YouTube
"Stars"
Click Here to view
the YouTube
interviews.
Unlike most people, I watched the entire video
with all three interviews. Here is how I feel about
it.
I don't
think there was a thing wrong with doing the interviews.
All three people handled themselves very well. Sure
GloZell Green messed up a little, but I'm sure nerves
had to have played a part. And obviously the questions
were all approved ahead of time, as it was clear Obama
had his answers prepared, which is understandable. I
guess. No big deal.
What I noticed was that GloZell Green and Hank
Green (no relation to each other) both came with liberal
views and together allowed Obama to speak on two
highly explosive topics from his liberal agenda quite
easily. There was no rebuttal, no one taking the
conservative side that could ask a challenging follow-up
question. However, the other questions by all three
interviewers were actually quite fair and down the
middle.
Though it would have been much better had
there been a voiced conservative to ask a couple solid
conservative questions, overall it was put together well
and tastefully done.
All-in-all I hope that if and when we get
a true conservative in office that he/she will not
hesitate to use the same type of platform to get
information out there to people on the
internet. |
|
My Marriage
Proposal
Liberals did not like
it.
I "proposed" the following ideas on a
mainstream blog. It turned out liberals do not really
want what they call "marriage equality" for homosexuals.
They were not happy with my truly equal proposal.
Below is what I proposed:
.
1 - Do away with marriage licenses.
Get the government out of our personal business.
2 -
Recognize just the CLAIM of two consenting adults to be
married, no matter who they are. This allows people to
make their own decisions of right and wrong for them.
3 - The government should allow any legal benefits
to any such CLAIMS of marriage.
4 - The
government should NOT force the recognition of any
marriage on anyone in society, businesses included.
Everyone should have the right to say NO to
participating.
5 - Schools should leave the
teaching of "what is a family" to parents at home.
6
- Schools should not allow children to talk about any
type of sexuality, but rather just teach them
academics.
7 - The government should not
interfere in the raising of people's children,
homosexual parents or heterosexual parents.
NOTE: We've never needed licenses to have
children. We simply obtain a birth certificate showing
proof of a birth. And yet we always have had legal
rights as parents and children.
NOTE: 3 -
"The government should allow any legal benefits to any
such CLAIMS of marriage." -- YES people would STILL have
ALL legal rights of a
marriage.
|
|
FOX News - Why I Don't Watch
It
That's
Right.
I wish
that more conservatives would recognize that FOX News is
in the business of making money. I personally believe
FOX News does what it does to play us conservatives, and
that we would do well to know this and to keep it in
mind.
For example, Hannity and Colmes was
put together just for the fight. Often Colmes did not
even know what he was talking about. He was just playing
a part on a show. Then there is Megyn Kelly who is not a
conservative and has come out and admitted such, by
saying she has never claimed to be one. It would
simply do our side well if we know who it is that we are
getting information from. Even though the other news
sources are recognized for being liberal, I would rather
listen to them and not be fooled. --Then I know to take
anything they say and do my own homework to learn "the
rest of the story." Sometimes I can learn a lot by
listening to a mainstream story, because I am keen to
their usual slant and as with listening to a lying
child, I can figure out the truth in-between what they
are saying. They usually slip somewhere and give it
away.
Basically, I do what a judge does, when
listening to the news. I assume everyone is giving their
slant and do not fully believe any of them, and I get to
the truth on my
own. |
|
Could I
Vote For Ted Cruz
Let's think about
this.
Born in Canada
to an American mother and a Cuban father, Ted Cruz is an
American, a Cuban, and a Canadian. He has formally
renounce his Canadian citizenship and I have no idea if
he is considered to be officially a Cuban, as I do
not know Cuban law.
I have tried to get to the bottom of what
a natural born citizen is in the U.S. And I have concluded the term must have been
common knowledge back then, so much so that our founding
fathers did not define it. It has become clear to me
that this is a term that can only be looked at logically
today, as no one can honestly say he/she has the
absolute definition of it. With that said, my opinion of
what it means is just that, my opinion. And my opinion
makes sense to me, as that which is in the best interest
of our country. I believe that a natural born citizen is
a person who was born here and whose parents were born
here as well.
When a person is born
in another country, and or his/her parent(s) was/were
born in another country, there is a strong possibility
there will be an allegiance problem towards our country.
And it is not good to have a president whose
allegiance is not fully to our country. We
have seen this with Obama. At the very least, we know
for a fact that his father was not born here.
Ted Cruz might have
an allegiance fully to our country. But because I
believe as I believe about the meaning of a natural born
citizen, I have to apply that belief across the board to
everyone. With that said, now here comes the kicker.
Though I believe Cruz does not qualify, since they
allowed Obama into that office, I have NO problem
ignoring this belief of mine and pulling a lever for
this fine Southern Baptist Republican who appears to
love this country very much and far more than any
liberal Democrat that runs for office ever
would. If they are going to put a person on the ballot
who in my opinion does not qualify, it is my choice to
ignore such and still vote for that
person. |
|
Guns &
Alcohol
Let's be reasonable
here.
The second amendment needs to be
protected. However with that comes responsibility that
should be mandatory to be taught to gun owners on a
regular basis. Gun safety and gun dangers and gun
lessons should just as extensively be taught to regular
citizens who own guns, as these things are taught to
cops. Also, people should be encouraged to only have a
gun if the need for a gun outweighs the dangers of
having one.
With that said, I just cannot
understand why people who are against guns are not
equally against alcohol, which kills 20 times as many
people in accident-related automobile deaths each year
in the country and injures approximately 345,000, from
scrapes to loss of limbs to parallelizations.
It takes just one drink to impair a person's
judgement, then the person can drink another and another
and another and then get behind the wheel of a car and
kill someone. Okay, we most likely cannot outlaw
alcohol, but could we not do what we can do in trying to
get people to stop drinking all on their own and make
drinking a shameful thing to do?
I
challenge people who are wanting more strict gun laws
(or to fully outlaw guns) to also speak just as strongly
against alcohol. If such people cannot, then they
cannot honestly say that they are going after guns
for the sake of saving
lives. |
2014 News Page: Click
Here
| |
