www.InformingChristians.com


  
Flight 93 Memorial - Update
Heroes Soon Forgotten
A Letter To Congress
The Original Article Is Below

    


It was the heroes of Flight 93 that stopped that plane from going into a fourth building, on that horrific 9/11/01 morning that is forever etched in the minds of every American old enough to remember. It was said that the plane would have flown into the very building that Congress works in, the U.S. Capitol. It goes through my mind as to how many of you were there that day and were saved by the heroic people on that flight, and how many appreciate what they did in the face of death. They thought of others that day. It is my hope that some of you will think of them now.

There were forty victims on that flight. So it is not a surprise that there are a variety of personalities within the many family members with many different opinions to match. With that, it just seems so odd that only half a dozen family members would be involved in the voting process that was said to have voted to use a design that has many attributes to an Islamic Mosque.

To listen to people who work for the North East National Park Service, one might actually believe that the voting was all-inclusive. But one would be wrong. The park service's own website shows the count to be half a dozen family members, along with seven other people. (click here) - Also, the fact is, a person had to qualify in order to even be in the meetings; and being a family member was not enough. For example, while Mr. Burnett was allowed in the meetings, Mrs. Burnett was not. --The Burnetts are the parents of Tom Burnett Jr., the man who, along with another man, headed up the forty Flight 93 heroes.

The park service also has a page designed to convince people of the support for the memorial design, complete with a video of family members supporting it. (click here) Problem is, that only three victims are represented in the video, which lies about family members who are not on the video and are against the design. One person goes as far as to say that sources speaking against the design are, "unrelated to the memorial partnership." Mr. and Mrs. Tom Burnett Sr. are absolutely related --as are others too. There were other family members that were involved in the meetings and voting, who did not want the design. The park service speaks of everyone having agreed that the design that won the vote would ultimately get built. However, the Burnetts never dreamed that an Islamic shaped design would be involved. And on top of everything else, the voting was done in secret.

One person on the video says that a person would have to be looking in order to find Islamic crescents in the design. Well that is odd, considering that the original name for the design was "Crescent" of Embrace! That's pretty obvious. And though the design is now called The "Circle" of Embrace, it still has the entire first design within it. 

The design includes a "Tower of Voices," that is not only a morbid reminder of the forty victims' voices calling out to loved ones on their cell phones, but is a perfect Islamic Minaret that would call Muslims to prayer. Actually, the entire design fits the requirements of a giant Islamic Mosque.

Mr. Burnett picked up on the Crescent Design and on the situation with the tower right away. Another parent got very upset at just the thought of her child's murderers being thought of in this process. One of the family members that was in support of the design said she liked it because she saw it as "reaching out." That is when the other family member, a parent, interpreted the "reaching out," as reaching out to Muslims, and said that she did not want to reach out to those who murdered her child. 

A couple years later, Mr. and Mrs. Burnett found out about a book that points out all of the Islamic references in the design and met the author Alec Rawls. Along with other family members, many Americans have signed a petition to stop the design from being built. (click here)

The newest shame-buzz phrase has already been tossed into this arena - "conspiracy theorists." Which of course is suppose to make all those who oppose the design pull back in shame. Well, it might do so with weak people. But the Burnetts are not weak. One can truly see where their son got his strength. 

Mrs. Burnett got involved for two main reasons: 1) to secure the crash site and 2) to bury the rest of the remains. Though the site has been secured, the rest of the remains have still not been buried. It is believed that there are still remains scattered across a seven-mile area. As Mrs. Burnett calls it, it is an "open burial ground." Mrs. Burnett has also said that many people would like to keep it as it is now, simple and respectful to all of the victims. But it seems that some want to make a freak show out of the crash site, even going as far as stating in one report that they want people to "feel the spirits of the forty heroes in the whisper of the trees." That is pagan and sick! The Lord's children are in heaven, not floating around some trees. 

Whether or not the design's resemblance of an Islamic Mosque was conspired or not does not matter when it comes to fixing this problem. It does matter in the whole of this, but certainly not in order to fix things. If a surgeon accidentally leaves something in you during surgery, you would still require that he fix the situation. Likewise, whether this was the most incredible accident in park design history or not, it needs fixed.

It is interesting what great lengths the park service is going to in order to defend the Islamic shaped memorial. They could simply put it in the shape of a four-sided design and get rid of that awful tower. Problem solved. However, when I spoke with the park's person-of-choice to handle the media, I was told that the next person may want a rose bush changed and asked where do they stop. He said that they need to get this built and cannot have things backing it up. This was the same gentleman who told me that the Burnetts were the only people against the design. If he really believes that the Burnetts are the only people unhappy with it and two simple changes would please them, then it stands to reason to do it, and there would be no one wanting to move a rose bush. Instead the park service is going way overboard defending this design. And of course the Burnetts are not the only family members. It is also said that not all the victims' families know about the design.
      

      
Teresa Heinz, the wife of Senator John Kerry and widow of the late U.S. Senator H. John Heinz III, funded the contest that was to find a design for the flight 93 memorial, via The Heinz Endowments. (click here

The Heinz Endowments, which Teresa is the chair-person of, has also given money to the Tides Foundation, a foundation that gives money to the Islamic group, CAIR. And although the Heinz Endowments claims any money it has donated to the Tides Foundation was for specific things, it does not say all of those specific things. The Heinz Endowments also implies that it would not give money to an extremist agenda, but never states if the Islamic group would be considered such. --click here and click here

In speaking with those related to the North East National Park Service and the Heinz Endowments, the Burnetts were made to sound like troublemakers, while I was being told that what I was seeing in the design was not really what I was seeing. And "conspiracy theorists" was tossed in, as well. I reminded one person that 9/11 was a "conspiracy," and that it is not a far cry to think that someone may be pushing for this to be, oh, I don't know, a "healing with Islam" memorial. It is not as if we have not seen this angle before. Nonetheless, I came away from call-after-call, thinking, "Wow, they are going too far to defend this design." And the ironic thing about this is that it was a privately paid for contest and chosen design, according to the park service's spokesperson, one that will be built with money that includes millions of tax-payer money. And there is even a bigger twist on this. The notes that were taken by recorders in the contest meetings were all destroyed after reports were written. I was told that they could do this due to the meetings being private and the contest being paid for with private funds, the funds that Teresa Heinz's organization provided. 


So, why is a privately paid for contest resulting in a design that is so controversial, being paid for in any part by American citizens? Why is the national park services going along with it? Where is the proof that the meetings even went the way that the reports said they went. With all of the recorded notes destroyed and a secret voting, how do we really know the true outcome of those meetings? Where's the proof?

The park is asking for donations for the remainder of the cost to build the memorial. I wonder how many people who donate, know about the controversial design. It is not as if it would remain a secret, once the huge design is built, if not stopped. 

I also wonder how many people know about the harm that has been done to the main land owner in this. Is this what America is about, being thugs and trying to ruin people? click here and click here --Note in the first article, that this land owner has said that he "wants no money for the land where the plane actually crashed."

As for the Burnetts, they have said that they are willing to simply have thier son's name removed from the memorial. The park service has declined even that request. That should make anyone of a reasonable mind see who the real troublemakers are. 

The park service has only those who are for the design, speaking on memorial videos, totally disregarding the others. The park service is not conveying the fullness of this situation, claiming that everyone but the Burnetts are okay with the design. Even if it were just the Burnetts, shouldn't they matter too? And how hard would it be then to appease them if they truly were the only ones? On phone calls, I could hear that the park service does not care about the parents of Tom Burnett Jr. --But they are not the only ones. There are others, and they should matter, as well. Will you remember them?

Please see below to see exactly what all of the controversy is about in clear and to the point details. I have spoken with Mr. and Mrs. Burnett, and they are the furthest from troublemakers. They simply know when it is time to take a stand and do that which is right. Does this sound familiar?

Debra J.M. Smith
November 23, 2009

To all others, please send this letter to your congressman/woman, if you believe he/she would care. I plan to run off copies and send it out to any congress person that I feel might care.

Special thanks to: Mr. and Mrs. Burnett - Parents of Tom Burnett Jr.
                           Alec Ralws - Author of Crescent of Betrayal 
                           Diane Gramley - From American Family Association of Pennsylvania

-

 

 

  
Flight 93 Memorial
A Matter of Honor - A Matter of Disgrace

Debra J.M. Smith - www.InformingChristians.com



Memorial Plan For Flight 93 Crash Site In Pennsylvania
There is audio, above, that goes with this article, for easier understanding.


Original Name: Crescent of Embrace

      Newer Name: The Circle of Embrace

           Name Meaning: The circle of peace was broken that day

                 Original Design: A crescent that points to Mecca, fulfilling the requirements of an Islamic Mosque  

                       Newer Design: An extra arc of trees, which is placed behind the opening of the unchanged crescent design 

                                  Inscription Blocks: Designed with forty-four translucent blocks - forty victims' names are to be inscribed

                                         Special Feature: Crescent topped tower, an Islamic prayer-time sundial, containing forty huge chimes


1)   Original name: Crescent of Embrace

Architects, Paul Murdoch and Byrd Woltz designed the memorial with the shape of a crescent. Would they design a memorial for an attack in a predominately Muslim nation in the shape of a cross?

 

2)  Newer Name: The Circle of Embrace

The architects now call it a broken circle. The only thing different is that the arc of the circle, the part that is broken off of the circle, is now placed behind the opening of the crescent. The unbroken part of the circle, what symbolically remains standing in the wake of 9/11, is still a giant Islamic shaped crescent.

3)  Name Meaning: The circle of peace was broken that day

This would be recognizing a peace circle being broken, hence depicting the actions of (and honoring) those who broke it: the terrorists.

We want those who broke the chain of events to be honored, the forty passengers and crew on Flight 93, not those who broke the circle of peace
.

4)  Original Design: A crescent that points to Mecca, fulfilling the requirements of an Islamic Mosque
 



The original design is shaped as a crescent, with the crash site placed roughly in the position of the star on an Islamic crescent and star flag.

If you were to stand right between the tips of the crescent and face into the center of the crescent, you would be facing North East, which from the crash-site is the direction to Mecca. That is the Muslim direction for prayer, so if you are a Muslim, this site should make you quite happy.

The Mecca-orientation of the giant crescent makes it a mihrab, the Mecca-direction indicator around which every mosque is built. Muslims who are sympathetic to Bin Laden would definitely want to take a trip here, not just to pray at the world’s largest

 Crescent of Betrayal.com

Mosque, but also to pray at a terrorist-memorial mosque.


"Mecca" (Makkah in Arabic), the center of the Islamic world and the birthplace of both the Prophet Muhammad and the religion he founded is the direction that Muslims pray five times a day. 

Muslims face towards Mecca and are united to the Ka’ba (Islam's most sacred shrine in Mecca) by an un-seen line of direction called the qibla.

You may have heard about the fifth pillar of Islam, the pilgrimage to Mecca. The fifth pillar of Islam says every able-bodied Islam with money enough to go, is to go to Mecca once in his or her life.



5)
  Newer Design:
An extra arc of trees, which is placed behind the opening of the unchanged crescent design
       




After an up-rise over the original design, architects, Paul Murdoch and Byrd Woltz presented another. However, the new design still fully includes the first design.

 Crescent of Betrayal.com

All the architects did was place an arc of trees behind the opening of the crescent on the original design. The arc of trees is not connected to the original crescent. It does not connect the ends or in any way close the opening of the already existing arc of trees that form a crescent.

According to the Park Service’s own website, the circle is still broken. The unbroken part of the circle, what remains from the terror attack on Flight 93, is still a giant Islamic crescent, still pointing to Mecca.

The architects now describe this as an arc of trees embracing a field of honor, instead of using the word crescent. Geometrically a crescent is an arc. An architect would be aware of this. Replacing a word with a synonym of that word, and placing an extra arc that is not attached to the original arc/crescent, is not a true redesign.

To sum it up, the new design that is now called the Circle of Embrace is not a circle at all. But rather it is an arc, a crescent with an arc of trees behind the opening. An architect knows a broken circle is in fact, an arc. In this case, a crescent.


 

6)  Inscription Blocks: Designed with forty-four translucent blocks - forty victims' names are to be inscribed

The forty-four translucent blocks are all placed along the flight path that symbolically breaks the circle.

Forty are inscribed with the names of the heroic passengers and crew.

Three more of the same size translucent blocks are inscribed with the 9/11 date. They are set in a separate upper section of Memorial Wall that is centered on the centerline of the giant crescent, which is the exact position of the star on an Islamic flag. The 9/11 date goes to the Islamic star. The date goes to the terrorists.


The forty-fourth translucent block on the flight path is larger than the others. It is the giant glass block that sits at the upper crescent tip, commemorating the spot where the terrorists broke our peaceful circle and turned it into a giant Mecca-oriented crescent. To be inscribed: "A Field of Honor Forever."

7)  Special Feature: Crescent topped tower is an Islamic prayer-time sundial, containing forty huge chimes

 


Forty wind chimes, representing the lives of our heroes, hang within the tower, while another Islamic-shaped crescent literally soars overhead.

You may have seen how many Islamic minarets are adorned with Islamic crescents on top. Minarets are used to call the time to prayer. Architect Paul Murdoch’s minaret-like tower calls the time to prayer by shadow length (which is how Islamic prayer times are determined).



 


They actually call it "The Tower of Voices." It is named this because the chimes are forever to be the voices of the people who died that day, calling out to love ones over the cell phones before the plane went down. This is morbid in itself, but as per Paul Murdoch's design, the “voices” also harkens the call to Islamic prayers.

For more information, please go to: www.CrescentOfBetrayal.com
To sign a petition, please go to: http://www.ipetitions.com/petition/HonorFlight93/.

Special thanks to Alec Rawls, the author of Crescent of Betrayal, for his much appreciated edits in this article. 

©
Debra J.M. Smith
 
www.InformingChristians.com 03-09-09.

November 2009 Update: http://www.debrajmsmith.com/flight93update.html
 


View Archives:
Click Here

Home

© Debra J.M. Smith

 
-